Overview
Two families turn a fitted model into something publishable.
plot() and the tl_plot_*() functions return
ggplot2 objects; tl_table() and the
tl_table_*() functions return gt tables. Both
dispatch on model type, so the same call covers a forest and a lasso
fit, and both hand back an object you can keep editing rather than
printed output you cannot.
Plots
plot() picks the visualisation from the model type, and
type narrows it further where a model supports more than
one view.
Regression
model_reg <- tl_model(mtcars, mpg ~ wt + hp, method = "linear")
# Actual vs predicted — one call
plot(model_reg, type = "actual_predicted")
Classification
split <- tl_split(iris, prop = 0.7, stratify = "Species", seed = 42)
model_clf <- tl_model(split$train, Species ~ ., method = "forest")
plot(model_clf, type = "confusion")
PCA
pca <- tidy_pca(USArrests, scale = TRUE)
tidy_pca_screeplot(pca)
tidy_pca_biplot(pca, label_obs = TRUE)
Regularisation
model_lasso <- tl_model(mtcars, mpg ~ ., method = "lasso")
tl_plot_regularization_path(model_lasso)
tl_plot_regularization_cv(model_lasso)
Tables
tl_table() mirrors the plot interface, dispatching on
model type and an optional type:
tl_table(model) # auto-selects the best table type
tl_table(model, type = "coefficients") # specific typeEvaluation Metrics
tl_table_metrics(model_reg)| Model Evaluation Metrics | |
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Rmse | 2.4689 |
| Mae | 1.9015 |
| Rsq | 0.8268 |
| tidylearn | linear (regression) | mpg ~ wt + hp | n = 32 | |
Coefficients
For linear and logistic models, the table includes standard errors, test statistics, and p-values, with significant terms highlighted:
tl_table_coefficients(model_reg)| Linear Model Coefficients | |||||
| Term | Estimate | Std. Error | t value | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | 37.2273 | 1.5988 | 23.2847 | 2.57 × 10−20 | * |
| wt | −3.8778 | 0.6327 | −6.1287 | 1.12 × 10−6 | * |
| hp | −0.0318 | 0.0090 | −3.5187 | 1.45 × 10−3 | * |
| tidylearn | linear (regression) | mpg ~ wt + hp | n = 32 | |||||
conf_int = TRUE adds a confidence interval, and
level sets its width:
tl_table_coefficients(model_reg, conf_int = TRUE, level = 0.9)| Linear Model Coefficients | |||||||
| Wald 90% intervals | |||||||
| Term | Estimate | Std. Error | Lower 90% | Upper 90% | t value | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | 37.2273 | 1.5988 | 34.5107 | 39.9438 | 23.2847 | 2.57 × 10−20 | * |
| wt | −3.8778 | 0.6327 | −4.9529 | −2.8027 | −6.1287 | 1.12 × 10−6 | * |
| hp | −0.0318 | 0.0090 | −0.0471 | −0.0164 | −3.5187 | 1.45 × 10−3 | * |
| tidylearn | linear (regression) | mpg ~ wt + hp | n = 32 | |||||||
These are Wald intervals, built from the standard errors in the
column beside them, so the interval and the p-value in a row always
agree about whether zero is excluded. For a logistic model,
exponentiate = TRUE reports odds ratios instead of log
odds.
For regularised models, coefficients are sorted by magnitude and zero
coefficients are greyed out. There is no interval to add — glmnet
reports no standard errors, and conf_int = TRUE is an error
here rather than a column of NA:
tl_table_coefficients(model_lasso)| Lasso Coefficients | ||
| lambda = 1.399 (1se) | ||
| Term | Coefficient | |Coefficient| |
|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | 33.9411 | 33.9411 |
| wt | −2.3645 | 2.3645 |
| cyl | −0.8434 | 0.8434 |
| hp | −0.0070 | 0.0070 |
| disp | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
| drat | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
| qsec | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
| vs | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
| am | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
| gear | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
| carb | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
| tidylearn | lasso (regression) | mpg ~ . | n = 32 | ||
The numbers behind these tables come from
tl_coefficients(), which takes the same arguments, returns
a tibble, and does not need gt installed:
tl_coefficients(model_reg, conf_int = TRUE)
#> # A tibble: 3 × 7
#> term estimate std_error conf_low conf_high statistic p_value
#> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 (Intercept) 37.2 1.60 34.0 40.5 23.3 2.57e-20
#> 2 wt -3.88 0.633 -5.17 -2.58 -6.13 1.12e- 6
#> 3 hp -0.0318 0.00903 -0.0502 -0.0133 -3.52 1.45e- 3Confusion Matrix
A formatted confusion matrix with correct predictions highlighted on the diagonal:
tl_table_confusion(model_clf, new_data = split$test)| Confusion Matrix | |||
| Actual |
Predicted
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
| setosa | versicolor | virginica | |
| setosa | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| versicolor | 0 | 15 | 0 |
| virginica | 0 | 2 | 13 |
| tidylearn | forest (classification) | Species ~ . | n = 105 | |||
Feature Importance
A ranked importance table with a colour gradient:
tl_table_importance(model_clf)| Feature Importance | |
| Top 4 features | |
| Feature | Importance |
|---|---|
| Petal.Length | 100.00 |
| Petal.Width | 88.23 |
| Sepal.Length | 29.63 |
| Sepal.Width | 15.77 |
| tidylearn | forest (classification) | Species ~ . | n = 105 | |
PCA Variance Explained
Cumulative variance is coloured green to highlight how many components are needed:
pca_model <- tl_model(USArrests, method = "pca")
tl_table_variance(pca_model)| PCA Variance Explained | ||||
| Component | Std. Dev. | Variance | Proportion | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC1 | 1.5749 | 2.4802 | 62.0% | 62.0% |
| PC2 | 0.9949 | 0.9898 | 24.7% | 86.8% |
| PC3 | 0.5971 | 0.3566 | 8.9% | 95.7% |
| PC4 | 0.4164 | 0.1734 | 4.3% | 100.0% |
| tidylearn | pca | n = 50 | ||||
PCA Loadings
A diverging red–blue colour scale highlights strong positive and negative loadings:
tl_table_loadings(pca_model)| PCA Loadings | ||||
| Variable | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Murder | −0.536 | −0.418 | 0.341 | 0.649 |
| Assault | −0.583 | −0.188 | 0.268 | −0.743 |
| UrbanPop | −0.278 | 0.873 | 0.378 | 0.134 |
| Rape | −0.543 | 0.167 | −0.818 | 0.089 |
| tidylearn | pca | n = 50 | ||||
Cluster Summary
Cluster sizes and mean feature values:
km <- tl_model(iris[, 1:4], method = "kmeans", k = 3)
tl_table_clusters(km)| Cluster Summary | |||||
| kmeans | 3 clusters | |||||
| Cluster | Size | Sepal.Length | Sepal.Width | Petal.Length | Petal.Width |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38 | 6.85 | 3.07 | 5.74 | 2.07 |
| 2 | 50 | 5.01 | 3.43 | 1.46 | 0.25 |
| 3 | 62 | 5.90 | 2.75 | 4.39 | 1.43 |
| tidylearn | kmeans | n = 150 | |||||
Model Comparison
Compare multiple models side-by-side:
m1 <- tl_model(split$train, Species ~ ., method = "svm")
m2 <- tl_model(split$train, Species ~ ., method = "forest")
m3 <- tl_model(split$train, Species ~ ., method = "tree")
tl_table_comparison(
m1, m2, m3,
new_data = split$test,
names = c("SVM", "Random Forest", "Decision Tree")
)| Model Comparison | |||
| 3 models compared | |||
| Metric | SVM | Random Forest | Decision Tree |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | 0.9111 | 0.9333 | 0.8889 |
| tidylearn | n = 45 | |||
Interactive Reporting with plotly
Every plot function returns a ggplot2 object, so
ggplotly() takes any of them without special handling:
library(plotly)
ggplotly(plot(model_reg, type = "actual_predicted"))
ggplotly(tidy_pca_biplot(pca, label_obs = TRUE))
ggplotly(tl_plot_regularization_path(model_lasso))Putting It Together
Fit, score, look, drill in — the four calls that make up most reporting sections:
# Fit
model <- tl_model(split$train, Species ~ ., method = "forest")
# Evaluate
tl_table_metrics(model, new_data = split$test)| Model Evaluation Metrics | |
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Accuracy | 0.9333 |
| tidylearn | forest (classification) | Species ~ . | n = 105 | |
# Visualise
plot(model, type = "confusion")
# Drill into feature importance
tl_table_importance(model, top_n = 4)| Feature Importance | |
| Top 4 features | |
| Feature | Importance |
|---|---|
| Petal.Length | 100.00 |
| Petal.Width | 91.09 |
| Sepal.Length | 28.28 |
| Sepal.Width | 13.44 |
| tidylearn | forest (classification) | Species ~ . | n = 105 | |
Swap method = "forest" for method = "tree"
or method = "svm" and the reporting code above works
without modification.
